The growing popularity of large language models (LLMs) leads to the emergence of various tools and frameworks supporting them. Two prominent names among them are Ollama and vLLM. Their main goal is to facilitate local or large-scale cloud/server deployments for LLM inference and serving.
In this blog post, we will make a detailed comparison between Ollama vs vLLM in different aspects (e.g., ease of use, hardware requirements, or performance). Read this post and you’ll find the answer to choose the right tool for your project!

But wait! Don’t rush to the comparison! Let’s take some time to understand the basics of Ollama and vLLM first:
Ollama is an open-source tool that allows you to download, install, customize, and run open-source large language models (LLMs) like gpt-oss, Llama 3.2, LlaVA, or Mistral locally. Think of it like a library where you can set up and store LLMs to handle specific tasks, from text generation and machine translation to coding and research support.
According to the 2025 StackOverflow Survey, 15.4% of developers have used Ollama in the past year, while nearly 60% plan to work with this tool in the future.
Ollama works by creating a separate environment on your system – whether it’s Linux, MacOS, or Windows – to operate LLMs and avoid possible conflicts with other software already installed on your device. This environment covers everything an LLM needs to perform a task, like pre-trained data, customizable configurations (that tell how the LLM should behave), and other essential dependencies (that support the model’s performance).
curl -fsSL <https://ollama.com/install.sh> | sh. vLLM, short for “very Large Language Model,” is an open-source library developed by the Sky Computing Lab at UC Berkeley. The tool acts as a high-performance backend for efficient LLM inference and serving on GPUs.
Developed on PyTorch (commonly used to train and operate large neural networks), vLLM can take advantage of a mature, well-tested environment to run LLMs locally. Further, by using CUDA, vLLM can run model inference faster and handle more requests at once efficiently on GPUs.
It also applies advanced optimization methods like continuous batching or memory-saving PagedAttention to increase speed while ensuring memory efficiency. This makes vLLM ideal for production-ready applications rather than just research experiments.
openai.ChatCompletion.create(...), you only need to change the URL to point to your own vLLM server. This helps you easily migrate from a cloud-hosted model to your own local/private setup.Now that you’ve understood the fundamentals of each tool, let’s learn about the key differences between vLLM and Ollama. In this section, we’ll make a detailed comparison of these two LLM serving tools in various aspects, like ease of use, performance, hardware flexibility, and more.
The Sky Computing Lab at UC Berkeley originally created vLLM in the form of a custom memory-management algorithm called PagedAttention.
LLMs often need to store the attention key-value cache in GPU memory while creating text, and require one large shared block of GPU memory for that cache. However, this consumes a lot of space (up to 60-80%) because chunks can’t always fit well. That’s why PagedAttention was introduced to fix this problem.
Considering GPU memory like a computer’s virtual memory, this algorithm divides the cache into various small pages (“fixed-size blocks”). The computer can reuse or move these blocks around, significantly reducing memory usage.
This innovation now becomes an underlying system for vLLM. With that smart memory management, vLLM can now use GPU memory more efficiently to:
Ollama, on the other hand, is developed to democratize access to LLMs by allowing users to use and run them on their local machines.
Traditionally, machine learning models require a lot of manual work, like labelling massive datasets and pre-processing text for the models to learn grammar and meaning. Ollama addresses this problem by using unsupervised learning and deep neural networks to explore language patterns themselves. Accordingly, Ollama’s architecture includes many neural networks stacked together in layers.
Ollama is easy to install and deploy. It just needs some commands and its Modelfile syntax makes customization simple. Additionally, the inference framework offers a developer-friendly CLI or integrates with GUI tools to visualize installation.
Once you’ve downloaded Ollama, you can pull your preferred language models from the Ollama library. Upon installation, you can communicate with the models, send them a prompt, and wait for their generated responses.
vLLM is easy to install and deploy. You can call it through a simple Python API. But this tool is not as user-friendly as Ollama. It requires a bit more technical know-how and setup, especially for distributed inference across numerous GPUs.
Some developers recommend running vLLM inside Docker. This container bundles the tool with all its dependencies, hence keeping everything self-contained.
Using Docker separates the vLLM environment from other applications, so any updates or changes in vLLM won’t affect the rest of your system. Further, Docker ensures vLLM behaves consistently on any environment, whether laptops or cloud servers. This makes vLLM deployment across various systems easier and more efficient.
Ollama is developed to perform quite well on consumer-grade hardware, like laptops or desktop computers. The framework can run on GPUs for high speed, but it can work reasonably well on CPUs, which need to acquire enough memory to run language models effectively. For example, Ollama requires at least 8GB of RAM to run mid-sized models (e.g., 7 billion parameters).
vLLM is natively designed for powerful GPUs or multi-GPU servers. You can run this framework on CPUs despite slow and poor performance. This is because the tool takes advantage of GPU parallelism for quick token generation.
Ollama offers high-speed LLM inference, but its performance speed is limited by local hardware. The Ollama team has recently improved the software to make it run faster with more efficient usage of computer resources. With this update, Ollama can complete tasks up to 12x faster than before.
vLLM is optimized for heavy-duty, GPU-powered deployments. So, the inference framework can continuously provide superior throughput and low latency, even when handling concurrent queries at once. Its core PagedAttention mechanism, coupled with continuous batching, distributed inference, and other techniques, enables the tool to handle very large language models and perform high-volume workloads efficiently.
In a test with Ollama and vLLM on different performance benchmarks, the Red Hat AI team concluded that vLLM outperforms Ollama at scale. On a single NVIDIA GPU, vLLM offers significantly higher throughput and lower P99 latency when working with all concurrency levels.



Surprisingly, even when Ollama was adjusted for parallelism, its throughput still underperformed vLLM. Typically, vLLM’s TPS increased almost linearly when concurrency scaled. Meanwhile, Ollama still witnessed its relatively flat performance.

vLLM offers a variety of optimization techniques for GPU memory, typically PagedAttention. This mechanism reduces memory fragmentation by dividing the attention key-value cache into small “pages” to consume little GPU memory.
With this core capability, vLLM can run models with large context windows and handle multiple simultaneous requests without worrying about running out of GPU memory. This mechanism also makes vLLM extremely memory-efficient for large-scale, multi-user inference on very large models.
Meanwhile, Ollama comes with simpler memory management. It works fine on consumer-grade machines and runs well on CPU-only setups. But it doesn’t have advanced GPU memory features. So, for very large models or high concurrency, Ollama proves less memory-efficient.
vLLM comes with numerous features for seamless large, scalable deployments, including continuous batching, tensor/pipeline parallelism, etc. The experiment of the Red Head AI team also concluded that when concurrency increases, vLLM’s throughput scales well and delivers fast responses to requests.
In comparison, Ollama is built for local, single-machine use. It can serve many concurrent requests but limits the number of requests actively generating tokens at once to maintain low latency. This makes Ollama’s throughput limited. So, the inference framework doesn’t scale well with increasing concurrency levels.
Below is a comparison table summarizing the key differences between Ollama and vLLM:
| Feature | vLLM | Ollama |
| Key Innovation | Based on the core PagedAttention mechanism to optimize GPU memory | Based on the idea of democratizing access to LLMs on local machines |
| Ease of Use | Easy to install and deploy, but requires more technical expertise and setup | Easier to use and deploy with just a couple of commands; choose either CLI or external GUI tools to work with Ollama |
| Hardware Requirements | High-end GPUs | Mostly CPUs, consumer-grade GPUs |
| Inference Speed | Extremely fast (PagedAttention + other optimization techniques like continuous batching or distributed inference) | Fast but hardware-reliant; can’t keep up with vLLM’s inference speed even when being tuned for parallelism |
| Memory Efficiency | Excellent due to efficient GPU memory management | Good, but limited to very large models or high concurrency |
| Scalability | Scale well for large deployments and increasing concurrency levels | Limited |
| Main Use Cases | Production-ready, large-scale applications | Rapid prototyping, local experimentation |
With the mentioned differences in features and performance, when should you use Ollama and vLLM? Let’s take a deep look at real-world applications where Ollama and vLLM shine:

You’ve understood how Ollama and vLLM differ from each other in various aspects. So, how can you get started with each? This section will provide a step-by-step guide to installing and using each inference framework effectively.
To get started with Ollama, ensure you meet system requirements, from a supported operating system (Linux, macOS, Windows) to sufficient RAM (8 GB+ is commonly recommended for medium-sized models with 7B parameters). You can choose GPUs, but for quick prototyping and local AI experimentation, CPU setups are enough.
Go to the official Ollama site and download Ollama for your chosen OS. For Linux systems, install with the following command:
curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
Linux allows you to rent a remote, always-on machine from providers like AWS, DigitalOcean, or Linode.
This machine is often known as a Virtual Private Server (VPS). So, when you run Ollama on a Linux VPS instead of a local Linux computer, you can authorize anyone (e.g., team members or apps) to connect with the VPS through the Internet and run the models 24/7 without the need to turn your computer on every day.
In the Ollama CLI, pull a supported model you want to use via the general command like ollama pull <model-name> or ollama run <model-name>. For example:
ollama pull gpt-oss
ollama run gpt-oss
Note: Ollama enables developers to pull/download multiple LLMs simultaneously, but in separate command lines, because the ollama pull command does not accept the calling of multiple models. For example:
The tool can’t pull:
ollama pull gpt-oss llama-3.2 qwen-3
It can only pull:
ollama pull gpt-oss
ollama pull llama-3.2
ollama pull qwen-3
Upon installation, you can call Ollama’s API to start interacting with the model:
import requests
r = requests.post("http://localhost:11434/api/generate",
json={"model": "gpt-oss",
"prompt": "Explain a liberty in the game of Go"})
print(r.json())`
Similar to Ollama, you need to make sure your system meets requirements before installation. Check vLLM documentation to stay updated with its prerequisites:
You can use pip or conda to install vLLM:
# Install vLLM with CUDA 12.1
pip install vllm
# Use conda to build and manage a Python environment
conda create -n myenv python=3.12 -y
conda activate myenv
There are two ways to run vLLM: Offline batched inference and through OpenAI-Compatible Server.
For offline batched inference, you can import LLM and SamplingParams (sampling parameters for text generation), then identify a list of prompts, set sampling parameters, and call llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params).
vLLM by default downloads models from HuggingFace. But if you want to use models from ModelScope, you need to use the VLLM_USE_MODELSCOPE environment variable. Here’s an output returned from offline batched inference:
outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
for output in outputs:
prompt = output.prompt
generated_text = output.outputs[0].text
print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}")
You can also run vLLM as a service through the OpenAI API protocol. The framework starts the OpenAI-Compatible Server at http://localhost:8000, but you can change the address by using --host and --port arguments.
To start the vLLM server using the Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct model, use the following command:
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct
Once the server is activated, use the following prompts to query the model:
curl http://localhost:8000/v1/completions \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct",
"prompt": "San Francisco is a",
"max_tokens": 7,
"temperature": 0
}'
Because the server is compatible with OpenAI API, you can query the server via the openai Python package:
from openai import OpenAI
# Modify OpenAI's API key and API base to use vLLM's API server.
openai_api_key = "EMPTY"
openai_api_base = "http://localhost:8000/v1"
client = OpenAI(
api_key=openai_api_key,
base_url=openai_api_base,
)
completion = client.completions.create(model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct",
prompt="San Francisco is a")
print("Completion result:", completion)
Ollama and vLLM are two popular frameworks for LLM inference and serving. When the demand for deploying the language models increases, these frameworks and other alternatives will become increasingly crucial.
This blog post details the key differences between Ollama and vLLM in various aspects, from inference speed and memory efficiency to ease of use and main use cases.
In short, vLLM is best suited for enterprise-grade, production-grade AI applications that prioritize high throughput and low latency. Meanwhile, Ollama works best if you aim at rapid prototyping on local deployments and prioritize full control over data.
Do you need a trusted, experienced partner to develop LLM-based applications using such frameworks? Contact Designveloper!
As the leading software and AI development company in Vietnam, we’ve had 12 years of developing simple to complex AI systems across industries. Our dedicated team of 100+ skilled professionals owns strong technical and UX capabilities to develop high-quality, scalable AI solutions in alignment with your specific use cases.
We’ve integrated LangChain, OpenAI, and other cutting-edge technologies to automate support ticket triage for customer service. Further, we built an e-commerce chatbot that offers product information, recommends suitable products, and automatically sends emails to users.
With our proven track record and Agile approaches, we’re confident in delivering on-time projects within budget. If you want to transform your existing software with AI integration, Designveloper is eager to help!